[Radical Liberal]

Here:
http://www.ecb.int/ecb/educational/e.../index.en.html

Try to "win" at this game... it's pretty damn hard if you ask me.. only got one golden star for now.

[Maladiq]

It's called libertarianism, assbutt.

[Radical Liberal]

It's called libertarianism, assbutt.

Libertarians want to minimize the role of the "State"
While I just want it gone!

[Maladiq]

Libertarians want to minimize the role of the "State"
While I just want it gone!

You uncultured idiot. Read some political theory, would you?

[Nisarg]

Assbutt?

[Maladiq]

Assbutt?

An angel once said that.

[Alwin]

Libertarians want to minimize the role of the "State"
While I just want it gone!

You call yourself "Radical Liberal" and have an anarchy avatar. That's a triple oxymoron if I've ever seen one. What are you exactly?

[Maladiq]

You call yourself "Radical Liberal" and have an anarchy avatar. That's a triple oxymoron if I've ever seen one. What are you exactly?

The difference between liberals and libertarians is that only radical libertarians want the state gone.

[MikeLitoris]

You call yourself "Radical Liberal" and have an anarchy avatar. That's a triple oxymoron if I've ever seen one. What are you exactly?

Errm that is no oxymoron. If he was a conservative and had an anarchy avatar then yes. Radical conservative would also be an oxymoron.

[Radical Liberal]

Errm that is no oxymoron. If he was a conservative and had an anarchy avatar then yes. Radical conservative would also be an oxymoron.

Duh

PS: I am an Anarchist (on the liberal side) but WoG didn't let me write Anarcho or Anarchist or anything else like that as a Nick Name (can't imagine why... )
There are after all different kinds of anarchists: anarcho-communists, anarcho-syndicalists etc.

[ICFabian]

There are after all different kinds of anarchists: anarcho-communists, anarcho-syndicalists etc.

Funniest lot is the anarcho-capitalists. There's a contradiction if I ever saw one.

[Alwin]

Errm that is no oxymoron. If he was a conservative and had an anarchy avatar then yes. Radical conservative would also be an oxymoron.

Liberalism isn't radical, though. It is perfectly compatible with the status quo. Libertarianism is more radical, but it's not the same thing at all, and its idea of the role of the state in society is different from that of any anarchist thought, whether anarcho-capitalist or anarcho-communist. Of course, you can use the words incorrectly, in a more "everyday" sense, but I'm not really a fan of that practice.

Duh

PS: I am an Anarchist (on the liberal side) but WoG didn't let me write Anarcho or Anarchist or anything else like that as a Nick Name (can't imagine why... )
There are after all different kinds of anarchists: anarcho-communists, anarcho-syndicalists etc.

That is more understandable, although I still don't understand what "anarchist (on the liberal side)" means. Unfortunately, the "anarcho-" prefix has been abused quite hard during its history. I've seen the terms "anarcho-monarchist" and "anarcho-fascist" used seriously, without any hint of parody.

[Radical Liberal]

Liberalism isn't radical, though. It is perfectly compatible with the status quo. Libertarianism is more radical, but it's not the same thing at all, and its idea of the role of the state in society is different from that of any anarchist thought, whether anarcho-capitalist or anarcho-communist. Of course, you can use the words incorrectly, in a more "everyday" sense, but I'm not really a fan of that practice.



That is more understandable, although I still don't understand what "anarchist (on the liberal side)" means. Unfortunately, the "anarcho-" prefix has been abused quite hard during its history. I've seen the terms "anarcho-monarchist" and "anarcho-fascist" used seriously, without any hint of parody.

Well my friend, anarcho-communists are against the free market and money and are for Public\Collective Property, while an anarcho-liberal is for Free Trade, Private Property and Money.
Free Trade and Laissez-Faire

[Maladiq]

Funniest lot is the anarcho-capitalists. There's a contradiction if I ever saw one.

Not exactly. Both anarchism and capitalism are right wing doctrines. Capitalism can function in both the libertarian and authoritarian specters of policies.

On the other hand, anarcho-communism is pretty funny. Communism is the pinnacle of authoritarian leftism, while anarchism is the extreme libertarian right.

[Alwin]

Both anarchism and capitalism are right wing doctrines.

Bullshit #1,

Communism is the pinnacle of authoritarian leftism,

Bullshit #2,

while anarchism is the extreme libertarian right.

Bullshit #3.

[Maladiq]

Bullshit #1,



Bullshit #2,



Bullshit #3.

Congratulations, you learned a new word. But in itself, it is not a rebuttal.

[Alwin]

Congratulations, you learned a new word. But in itself, it is not a rebuttal.

What rebuttal do you need? You got the definitions wrong. If you said 2+2 equals 7, would I need to "rebutt" it if I didn't want to accept it as correct?

[Radical Liberal]

Didn't Maladiq glorify Soviet Romania and it's "efficient" debt removal policies?? Of which many people suffered...
It's obvious that you have read some stuff about the subject Maladiq but you've read it only superficially.

[Maladiq]

What rebuttal do you need? You got the definitions wrong. If you said 2+2 equals 7, would I need to "rebutt" it if I didn't want to accept it as correct?

At least read wikipedia, kiddo. We'll let the real books till you grow up.

[Maladiq]

Didn't Maladiq glorify Soviet Romania and it's "efficient" debt removal policies?? Of which many people suffered...
It's obvious that you have read some stuff about the subject Maladiq but you've read it only superficially.

The policies were efficient. At the revolution, Romania had 0 external debt. The suffering was not caused by the anti-dept policies, but by the money-stockpiling policies (since ceausescu wanted to compete with the World Bank in lending money to other countries). Had he stopped at 0 debt, the system would have been pretty sweet.

Now go make a fireball.